A LESSON LEARNED
September 11, 2009 8:46 am (eight years later)The first plane hit the World Trade Tower at 8:46 am. This most certainly would begin a day of infamy that well would rival December 7, 1941. Just like then, this day would mark another sneak attack by a bunch of heathen cowards.
This day should not be commemorated by a “work day” which was offered by a man bereft of good ideas... Obama. This day ought to be a day of remembrance of everything which transpired that day and we ought to be reminded that we are still engaged in a battle between heathen Muslim fundamentalists and the rest of the world.
While it is true that the battle is still yet abroad, freedom-loving Americans have a great deal to fear from president Barack Hussein Obama. The average American's ability to easily communicate with each other, and the rest of the world, is in the process of being stripped away. I am going to quote a recent news story in its entirety to prove this point.
Before I do that though let me ask you what one thing all totalitarian governments have in common? Of course their leaders are all heathen men and lost, including our own leader: but I am looking for the one thing they all do in order to control their people. The answer: they control all communication! Newspapers, radio, Internet, etc. By doing this they can spoon-feed their people only the hogwash they want them to have. This is exactly what North Korea, China, Cuba, and many other countries are doing at this present time.
After the war started and before Iraq was liberated, Hussein had been publicly broadcasting that the American invaders were being repelled by the “brave” soldiers of Iraq. Of course the truth was that even the vaunted Republican Guard troops were being handed defeat by the American soldiers as they were being chased and killed, yet with almost no allied loss of life.
Now, how do you suppose Hussein was able to, for awhile, deceive his people? He controlled all communication within the country, so he could easily lie to them. At least until American tanks rolled into the capital city and Hussein's own countrymen began to topple his statues. The reason I am telling you this is because under Obama we are on the same road. At least as far as a dictator (wannabe) desiring to control internal communication.
I am going to include a story (verbatim) on what the (hopeful) czar of America (Obama) would like to see happen... control all media outlets and make sure the citizens of America are misinformed. The bill I am going to discuss would offer Obama emergency control of the Internet by giving him a "kill switch" to shut down online traffic by seizing private networks — a move cybersecurity experts worry will choke off industry and civil liberties: as reported by Fox News. (Now-- to the news story)
Details of a revamped version of the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 emerged late on Thursday, months after an initial version authored by senator Jay Rockefeller was blasted in Silicon Valley as dangerous government intrusion. "In the original bill they empowered the president to essentially turn off the INTERNET in the case of a 'cyber-emergency', which they didn't define," said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, which represents the telecommunications industry. "We think it's a very bad idea ... to put in legislation," FOX News quoted him as saying.
Clinton said the new version of the bill that surfaced this week is improved from its first draft, but troubling language that was removed was replaced by vague language that could still offer the same powers to the president in case of an emergency.
"The current language is so unclear that we can't be confident that the changes have actually been made," he said.
The new legislation allows the president to "declare a cybersecurity emergency" relating to "non-governmental" computer networks and make a plan to respond to the danger, according to an excerpt — a broad license that rights experts worry would give the president "amorphous powers" over private users.
If the above story I copied and placed in today's blog doesn't bother you... it should. You see, I believe on a limited scale they are already attempting this. Very easily they can control all access to the Internet by shutting down the servers... that would be easy. Although I believe that is what will happen in the short term... shut down everyone: I think in the long term they will only allow those who are not critical of a socialist government to ever get back up and running.
I try to stay in contact with people in different parts of the country. So far I have heard from people who live in California, New York, and Florida, and in those areas and at sundry times all of them are experiencing problems accessing the Internet: email accounts, Facebook, Twitter, etc., and all of this is happening only within the last six-month period, where it wasn't happening before.
My point is I believe someone in government is already experimenting to see if they can shut down individual accounts, yet on a mass scale. To see if I am correct about problems accessing accounts where there were not problems before... start emailing and talking to friends you have in different parts of the country and see if they also are experiencing problems as well?
Just a question. If you had never before experienced problems accessing all types of mass communication on the Internet until Congress began discussing a “kill switch,” (as a viable option for the presidents to use) don't you think it is more than coincidence that users all over the country are now complaining about different times when they seem to be “locked out” of all of their accounts?
For the sake of argument, let's say I am wrong: all across the country Internet users inability to access their accounts is nothing more than a serious and unexplained glitch in the system: even if that is true, it is also still true that liberal Democrats are presently drafting bills to allow Obama to lock everyone out of the Internet at his sole discretion! That my friend is a power (controlling a nation's ability to communicate and receive news) that only despots in Communists countries seek to wield over their people.
Greek culture, nearly two centuries before the birth of Christ, used smoke-signals to pass information on to those who lived far away. I can't imagine smoke-signals today would be a good option, unless you used the smoke from a burning DC... just kidding! However, I do think it might be a good idea to try and find a low-tech option for passing on pertinent information when the (hopeful) czar of DC kills mass communication on the Internet. Can anyone say... ham radio?
You can always email me at clarkmatthews1@aol.com
posted by Robin Johnson @ 7:39 PM
<< Home