FROM NOW ON... IT'S ME AND THE TURTLES
Wednesday May 16, 2012 8:15 pm
The day before yesterday
I took my mail from the box and there was a small book inside marked, “Resident.” So, I spent the next 30 minutes knocking on doors
close to my house to see if a Mr. or Mrs. 'Resident' lived nearby?
Sorry, that's my terrible joke for the day (: Anyway... the small
(223 page paperback) book was evidently intended for whoever opened
their mailbox, so I decided to read it.
I'll tell you what most
intrigued me about it and why I am posting this instead of continuing
tonight with another excerpt on the several part message about the Second Coming of Christ. Maybe though I have found another sign? Perhaps
this other sign is the glut in the market today of books impostering
as “Bibles?”
The book in my mailbox was titled: The
Seed Principle. In reality a lot of it was interesting... yet they
had to make some incredible reaches in order to try and make their point in
certain places. Anyway, would you believe that in this single 223
page book... they used 18 different “Bible” versions. 18
DIFFERENT BIBLE VERSIONS!!!
Before I name all the
different versions they used could I ask the readers of this blog an
easy question to answer? Here it is: “If two statements are made,
and they are opposed to each other... can both be right?” Of course
the answer is an emphatic, “No!”
Now in the above scenario
about two different statements being made I will give a couple of
possibilities. First: it is possible that one statement is correct
and the other is wrong. Secondly: it is also possible that both
statements are wrong. But... it is NOT POSSIBLE that two statements
which disagree with each other are both correct!
Of course I am meaning
“absolute” statements. For example: a person could say it is
raining outside and another person might say it is not: and both
could be correct. Because, the rain could have started and stopped...
the two statements about rain could have been made at different
times... the two people talking about the rain could be speaking
about different locations, etc. etc. etc. (I am really not interested
in someone reading this and making up straw-man arguments like the
one I thought up and wrote about rain: in order to try and imagine
some way that two opposing statements could both be right?) In this
blog I am honestly only trying to reach any person who is sincere and
using some version other than the KJV... and for them I would like to
ask what should be an easy to answer question: why?
I'll now list the 18
different version they used in their small book in order to “prove”
their doctrine. May I humbly say... if you can't either prove or
disprove your point with a single Bible then you honestly don't have
much going for you anyway!
Here is the order the
verses appeared in the book. Now, many of the verse references were
used in multiple places throughout the entire book.
KJV (King James Version)
ICB (International
Children's Bible)
NVC (Who knows? More on
this later.)
NLT (New Living
Translation)
NIV (New International
Version)
NCV (New Century Version)
NRSVA (New Revised
Standard Version Apocrypha)
TLB (Tyndale Living
Bible)
DNT (Same as the NVC???)
YLT (Young's Literal
Translation)
TMNT (Again... I could
find nothing about this one either. However, I might have figured
this one out?)
NKJV (New King James
Version)
TMSG (The Message Bible)
GWT (God's Word
Translation)
ISVNT (This one can take
its place with the NVC, DNT, and the TMNT in the who knows category.)
NRSV (New Revised
Standard Version)
TEV (The last one in the
I have no idea category.)
NASB (New American
Standard Bible)
There you have it... 18
different “Bibles” being used in this short book to try and teach
doctrine: and wait for it... I checked, and many of the supposedly
same verses disagreed with each other! Surprised?
For the letters that I
couldn't find books for I actually took the time to skim back through
and make certain I hadn't transposed letters... I hadn't. The NVC is
first quoted on page 6. The DNT and the TMNT are both (first) quoted
on page 12. The ISVNT is (first) quoted on page 57. And the TEV is
quoted on page 127.
Now, you might be reading
this and saying to yourself that is “a little excessive” to quote
that many supposed Bibles to try and make a point. But, I'll ask
you... what is an acceptable number for you to use when you
supposedly believe that the Bible is God's Word! And the fact that
God's Word... at least His true Word, would have no disagreements.
I'll ask you in the same
way I ask those who kill children in the womb to give me a number.
For them I ask when is it acceptable to kill a baby. How about... one
minute after birth? No? Okay... one minute before birth? No? An hour
before birth? No? Anyway, I keep asking them to back up in hours,
weeks, months, etc. and usually they can't name a time when it is
accepatable to kill a living child.
So, I'll ask you... how
many “Bibles” would be good to use in order to try and make your
point... 16? No? How about 12? No? Why not? See, any honest thinking
person can tell that people use multiple “Bibles” usually because
they are searching for some reading that is supposed to be from God
that will “prove” some strange doctrine they believe: else, they
search many different versions trying to find some that doesn't name
sin in the same way the KJV does. Why? Perhaps it is so they will not
feel as guilty whenever they are reading their “Bibles” and their
particular sin they are enjoying has been watered down to the point
that it almost doesn't even sound like sin?
Do you want to see some
verses that state the above truth. II Timothy 4:3-4: “For the time
will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their
own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching
ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall
be turned into fables.”
I began this by saying
that maybe the glut of so-called “Bibles” on the market is
another sign that the end is near: in truth, that might be very close to
the mark. Because, as the end draws nearer... there are more and more
false men and women who are out there preaching “another Gospel”
and using faux Bibles.
Look... if you knew me
you, rather than only reading what I write, then you would know I am
the worst sinner you have ever met: and sadly, I'm not even kidding.
But, one thing I refuse to do: I refuse to hunt for some other book
that is pretending to be the Bible just so I can somehow try and make
myself believe that God doesn't really hate sin after all? Nor, will
I go looking for teachers and preachers who never name sin and are
nothing more than cheerleaders telling everyone that they are okay.
Sorry, that's not for me.
I'll now tell you that I
did figure out what the TMNT Bible is. As with the others I couldn't
figure out I tried to imagine what the letters would stand for? This
one I now know. The TMNT “Bible” is the TEENAGE MUTNANT NINJA
TURTLE. (I feel very confident that is right.) Because of that and
the great respect I have for those four turtles... in the future I am
only going to do my reading and receive my inspiration from the KJV AND the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle's book. Doesn't that sound good?
<< Home